The New York Times A.P. Index Keep track of the
latest Tech news

 

NYTimes: Home - Site Index - Archive - Help

Welcome, raleksick - Member Center - Log Out
Site Search:  



ARTICLE TOOLS
Email This Article E-Mail This Article
Printer Friendly Format Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-mailed Articles Most E-Mailed Articles

TIMES NEWS TRACKER

Track news that interests you.


Travel
Taking a trip to the Windy City? Unwind in The Peninsula Chicago‚ visit the Art Institute and see Picasso’s “The Old Guitarist” or indulge in a juicy steak from Morton’s of Chicago.  

Plan a trip to Chicago today.
Share your Chicago travel experiences with others.


Officials Grill Operator Over Nuke Mishap

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: August 20, 2004

Filed at 3:55 a.m. ET

TOKYO (AP) -- Officials at a Japanese nuclear plant where four workers died in a recent accident defended themselves Friday against charges of lax safety standards, saying there was no evidence the plant was dangerous before the accident.

The Nuclear Safety Commission grilled officials from Kansai Electrical Power Co. in a second day of hearings about the Aug. 9 accident, in which a cooling pipe burst at a plant in Mihama, 200 miles west of Tokyo, spewing boiling water and superheated steam on workers.

Advertisement

Kansai Electric has faced heavy criticism after disclosing it had not properly inspected the aging pipe for years despite the tendency of such pipes to erode over time.

Company officials, however, said there was no reason to believe the pipe was about to explode.

``We had no information that the portion of the pipe was posing an immediate danger,'' said Kansai Electric executive Yonezo Tsujikura. ``So we only planned to include that portion as part of a list for the August inspection.''

That inspection had been scheduled for Aug. 14 -- days after the accident occurred.

The company, which operates eight nuclear plants, is being investigated on suspicion of negligence leading to death.

At the hearing, commission members raised questions about why the operator was unaware of an imminent danger from the pipe even after learning that the portion of the pipe had not been inspected for nearly three decades.

Commission members argued that Kansai had a responsibility to ensure the safety of the plant, but failed to have the proper guidelines in place.

``The failure to inspect the part of the pipe near (the sections considered vulnerable) shows you didn't have a system of multilayer safety checks,'' said Koji Okamoto, a Tokyo University engineering professor and a commission member.

Masashi Hirano, a nuclear reactor expert on the panel, also criticized the company for concluding the part of the pipe that ultimately burst was safe because other portions of the same pipe passed inspections.

``I don't think you could have assumed that the portion was safe,'' he said.

The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said on Friday that nine other accidents caused by pipe erosion had been reported in the past 33 years, including one in July at another Kansai Electric plant. No injuries and major damages were reported.

Agency officials also said recent safety inspection reports showed Kansai Electric had skipped necessary inspections at 17 locations of cooling pipes at eight nuclear plants, including two that are currently suspended for regular checks.


Special Offer: Home Delivery of The Times from $2.90/week.


TOP INTERNATIONAL ARTICLES
. Scene at Shrine in Najaf Is Confused; U.S. Holds Back
. Israeli Court Orders Assessment of West Bank Barrier
. Iran Says It May Pre-empt Attack Against Its Nuclear Facilities
. Chess Is Her Passion and, She Declares, So Is Bobby-San
Go to International

TOP NYTIMES.COM ARTICLES
. Scene at Shrine in Najaf Is Confused; U.S. Holds Back
. Friendly Fire: The Birth of an Anti-Kerry Ad
. North Korea Is Reaching Out, and World Is Reaching Back
. Anarchists Emerge as the Convention's Wild Card
Go to NYTimes.com Home

OUR ADVERTISERS
The Mounties are coming to Toronto!

FREE Stock Report!
>>Download here


Verizon Voice over Broadband for Business

Schwab portfolio
upgrade is here.